Sympathetic Vibratory Physics -It's a Musical
Universe!

Ordering
866-604-3463 TOLL FREE, M-F, 8am-11am MST - Site
Search - Free Catalog
& email us

More Common Law materials.

In court? Need assistance? Jurisdictionary

"In 1932, William Z. Foster, then National Chairman of the Communist
Party, USA, restated the first plank of the Communist Manifesto; "The
abolition of private property." Then in terms specifically
applicable to the U.S., Foster stated, "The establishment of an
American Soviet government will involve the confiscation of large landed
estates in town and country, and also, THE WHOLE BODY TO FORESTS,
MINERAL DEPOSITS, LAKES, RIVERS AND SO ON."

(Are we not seeing this in removal of forest roads, creating more
and more national monuments, zoning, establishing vast areas as wildlife
habitat, and taking control of other vast areas under the American
Heritage Rivers designations?)

Look at this statement by Gus Hall, Communist Party Chief: "The
battle will be lost, not when freedom of speech is finally taken away,
but when Americans become so adjusted or conditioned to getting along
with the group that when they finally see the threat, they will say, I
cant afford to be controversial."

Jodi Bari, Earth First: "IF WE DONT OVERTHROW CAPITALISM, WE DONT
STAND A CHANCE OF SAVING THE WORLD ECOLOGICALLY. I THINK ITS POSSIBLE TO
HAVE AN ECOLOGICALLY SOUND SOCIETY UNDER SOCIALISM. I DONT THINK ITS
POSSIBLE UNDER CAPITALISM."

Why Zoning Will Not Work...

Howard Fisher, Dale Pond, Pierre du Lac, Concerned Citizens Against
Zoning and many others

More Common Law materials.

It has been stated over and over again to The People of Cherry and neighboring counties
that zoning (as is being presented) is unconstitutional and therefore
unenforceable. Let it be said once again:

Zoning (or any other kind of equity/statutory proceedings) will not
protect this county, the Niobrara River and its
tributaries or its people from the Federal or state governments insatiable
desire for your land, your rights, your money and your property. Nor will it
stop development or use of another persons property by themselves as they see
fit.

You will also want to consider these case cites:

"Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved,
there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them."
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 491. Also see Marbury v. Madison, 1801.

"A county may not impose a charge for the enjoyment of a right granted by
the Federal Constitution."

McGoldrick v. Bewind-White Co., 309 U.S. 33, 56- 58.

The following quote from the most basic and authoritative source for legal
matters shows the beginning and end of it. From the American Jurisprudence which
is the authoritative encyclopedia of real law: 16 American Jurisprudence Section
256, 177, 2nd ed.:

"The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute. . though having
the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and
ineffective for any purpose, since unconstitutionality dates from the time of
its enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it. In
legal contemplation, it is as inoperative as if it had never been passed. Such a
statute leaves the question that it purports to settle just as it would be, had
the statute not been enacted.

"Such an unconstitutional law is void, the general principles follow that
it imposes no duties, confers no rights, creates no offices, bestows no power or
authority on anyone, affords no protection and justifies no acts performed under
it. . A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one. An
unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede any existing valid law, indeed,
insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the land, it is
superseded thereby.

No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound
to enforce it."

The reason zoning statutes are unconstitutional can be seen from the
following material. Zoning statutes violate your Constitutional rights to your
property and the unrestricted use thereof. You can, of course, voluntarily give
your rights to your property away either knowingly or unknowingly or by not
reserving your rights via the Uniform Commercial Code 1- 207 before zoning goes
into effect. To use zoning you will be required to pay for permits or
permissions to do what you now do Constitutionally.

Therefore, the nature of zoning and the kind of compliance sought is
compelling in nature and not an action under the Common Law. Under the
Common Law a person
cannot be compelled "to purchase, through a license fee or a license tax, the
privilege freely granted by the Constitution" Blue Island
v. Kozul, 41 N.E. 2d. 515 (As quoted in Murdock v. Pennsylvania (City of
Jeanette) 319 U.S. 105, 114.

At
issue here is that of Individual Common Law Rights of We
the People of the United States of America. This directly concerns the limits of
authority of all branches of government over each of us as individuals: the
Authority of the Executive, Legislative and Judicial Branches of Government.

As stated in the Declaration of Independence, we are endowed by our Creator
with certain Unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the
Pursuit of Happiness.

Thomas Jefferson placed great emphasis on the concept of Rights. He said we
did not bring the English Common Law , as such,
to this continent; we brought the Rights of Man. The reason why he said that is
that it is from the Common Law
controversies, all of which involved property, that all of our Rights have come
to be recognized in the Law.

In a lawful sense, Property is a bundle of
Rights, a bundle of Powers, wherein one claimant to these Rights
possesses these Rights to the exclusion of all other claimants to these Rights,
as these Rights pertain to the possession, occupancy and use of a specific piece
of property (your ranch maybe?).

So, at Common Law
,
Rights is the name of the game.

WANT TO LEARN COMMON LAW?
GET THE COMPLETE HOME STUDY COURSE
ON
COMMON AND STATUTORY LAW

The Bill of
Rights was added to the Constitution of the United States of
America because the Founding Fathers believed these Amendments should be added
to avoid misconstruction of the provisions of the Constitution of the United States of
America by Judges or bureaucrats and to avoid any abuse of powers by Judges of
the sort that had already, at that time, taken place in England and from which
abuse of powers we had just fought, and won, a revolution to be free. (See the
Preamble to the Bill
of Rights. The original Constitution has it, and in some sources
which print the Constitution this Preamble is included.) This abuse had been
committed by Judges and bureaucrats who were not tied down by any written
Constitution in England, and who had started to whittle away at the Common Law Rights in
England and the Colonies, by their decisions, with the cooperation of the
statutes passed by the Parliament (Congress) and enforced by the Crown
(Executive Branch - Police). This is precisely the combination of Executive and
Legislative Equity (otherwise known as Roman Civil or Chancery Law) from which
our Bill of
Rights prevents and protects us from.

As example, the Constitution of the Iowa has its Bill of Rights,
comprising Article I. The first two sections deserve special emphasis:

Section 1. All men are, by nature, free and equal, and have certain
inalienable rights - among which are those of enjoying and defending life and
liberty, acquiring, possessing and protecting property, and pursuing and
obtaining safety and happiness.

Section 2. All political power is inherent in the people. Government is
instituted for the protection, security, and benefit of the people, and they
have the right, at all times, to alter or reform the same, whenever the public
good may require it.

The Iowa State Constitution expressly includes, as inalienable, the Right of
acquiring, possessing and protecting Property, all of which are high on the
Priority List of Common
Law Rights. This is one example of a State Constitution securing Rights
which come from the Common Law . Other
examples are given at the end of this page.

Back in 1921 someone wrote:

"It is not the Right of property which is protected, but the Right to
property. Property, as such, has no rights; but the individual -the man -- has
three great Rights, equally sacred from interference: the Right to his LIFE; the
Right to his LIBERTY; the Right to his PROPERTY...."

The three Rights are so bound together as to be essentially one Right. To
give a man his life but deny him his liberty, is to take from him all that makes
life worth living. To give him his liberty but take from him the property which
is the fruit and badge of his liberty, is to still leave him a slave."

Thomas Jefferson said:

"Our rulers can have no authority over [our] natural rights, only as we
have submitted to them.

The rights of conscience we never submitted. We are answerable for them
to our God. The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are
injurious to others. "

This points up the significance of the requirement of the procedures of the
Common Law that there be an
injured party, that the injured party make a sworn complaint as to the injury
that has been done to him by the alleged injured party. That unless this is
done, the Courts, county or city governments, do not have jurisdiction over the
People.

Only in communist/fascist countries does "the state" bring suits against the
people. In America, "the state" serves and is subservient to The People. We have
been told, from childhood, that we have unalienable Rights, and we do!

Unalienable means
un - lien - able.

Unalienable means that they cannot be taken from us, and that we cannot be
forced to give them up. There are those who point out that, strictly speaking,
we cannot even give them up voluntarily. However, if we submit to those who
would rule over us, it is true that our Rights were not taken from us -- as
Thomas Jefferson said, -- we have submitted to their rule - voluntarily. We have
allowed ourselves to become their peons. There is one important fact concerning
slavery, of any sort, the institution of slavery or peonage depends upon the
cooperation of the slaves! Without the cooperation of those controlled, there
can be no blind compliance to a rule book instead of Law.

In Common Law
Courts our Rights are protected. The Rules and Procedures of the Common Law Courts were
established to protect our Property Rights -- to make it difficult for Property
to be taken from someone without Due Process of Law. The Right to require that
an injured party swear under oath as to damage or injury that he claims that you
caused to him, the Right to a Corpus Delicti: The body of the offense: "the
essence of the crime".

Under the Common Law ,
the Courts and bureaucrats do not have an automatic jurisdiction.

The Common Law
Rules and Procedures specify certain steps, or procedures, which must be done
and certain things which must not he done -- all as a protection to the Rights
of an Accused. And, as we have pointed out previously, Rights are inherent in
Property, and Property is inherent in Rights. We The People have the Right to
have our controversy, once the Common Law Court has
acquired jurisdiction, tried before a Common Law Jury of our Peers, wherein the
Jury has the authority to hear and decide questions of both Law and Fact. There
is no monkey do of pretending that arguments involving the Law must be held
outside of the hearing of the Jury and that their supposed only function is to
hear and decide questions of Fact presented in evidence and that the Judge will
tell them what he thinks the Law is or ought be!

The Founding Fathers operated under the Common Law , in
addition to the wording of the Constitution of the United States of America, in
Article VII of our Bill of Rights:

"In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed
twenty dollars, the right of trial shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a
jury shall be otherwise reexamined in any Court of the United States, than
according to the rules of common law."

The following was included in the instructions to the Jury in the first case
ever tried before the United States Supreme Court, as a court of
original jurisdiction, which means that a Trial by Jury was held in front of the
Supreme Court, with Chief
Justice John Jay presiding:

"It is presumed, that juries are the best judges of facts; it is, on the
other hand, presumably, that the courts are the best judges of law. But still
both objects are within your power of decision. You have a right to take upon
yourselves to judge both, and to determine the law as well as the fact in
controversy. " STATE OF GEORGIA vs. BRAILSELORD, 3 Dall I (1794 )

Our Property Rights are inseparable from our individual Rights and our
individual Rights are inseparable from our Property Rights. Because of this
inseparability both types of Rights are protected in the Procedures and Due
Process of the Courts of Common
Law.

The Bill of
Rights in both Constitutions have to do with matters that the governments,
both of the United States and of the State, and their agents and agencies, have
no authority at all to enact statutes, or to issue rules and regulations,
binding on the individual, dealing with such Rights as are included in the Bill of Rights.

It should be emphasized that the Ninth Amendment includes all of the Common
Law Rights which are not listed, or enumerated specifically, anywhere else. In
other words, the Bill of Rights are
prohibitions against government at any level over the individual, his rights or
his property or his use thereof.

The Constitution authorizes
Courts of Law and Courts of Equity. When the Constitution says Law, it means Common Law, because thats what the
Founding Fathers meant when they said Law. In Courts of Law your Rights are
protected by the Constitution and the
Rules and Procedures of the Common Law, known as Due Process of Law. The Bill of Rights was
adopted to avoid misconstruction and abuse of powers, by the Judges or
government agencies and their bureaucrats; but you must know that

in Courts of Equity,
by the nature of Equity jurisdiction,
you
do not have any Natural or
Constitutional Rights.

Within the existing Equity/Civil/Contract Courts the only rights you might
acquire for yourself are the terrible so-called Civil Rights or the rights under
the Uniform Commercial Code. These are much lesser rights than those of the Constitution because these latter are
Natural God given rights whereas the former are granted privileges from an
artificial government of bureaucrats.

Zoning is abusive Equity in action. It should be pointed out here that the
so-called Drivers License is a contract with the state and subjects the user to
contracted particulars he/she has never been informed of. Did you know you
signed a contract with your state when you signed that document? If you were not
given full disclosure (which you werent) before signing it the act is considered
a felony referred to as fraud. Think not? Look it up...

Equity recognizes Common
Law ...

The Nebraska Constitution says under Article V, Section 9: "The district
courts shall have both chancery [equity] and common law jurisdiction..."

"The Common Law is absolutely distinguished from the Roman or Civil Law
systems." People v Ballard, 155 NYS 2d 59.

The following quote is from Andersons Uniform Commercial Code which is used
by every legal beagle in the country.

(section)1-103:6. Common Law .
"The Code is "complementary" to the common law which remains in force except
where displaced by the Code... courts have adopted the principle of statutory
construction that a statute will not be construed so as to overrule a principle
of established common law... A statute should be construed in harmony with the
common law .... The Code cannot be read to preclude a common law action."

The Iowa Constitution, Article V, Section 6, says: "The District Court
shall be a court of law and equity, which shall be distinct and separate
jurisdictions..."

A Colorado statute (13-25-106) says: "Every court of this state shall
take notice of the common law..."

The Common Law ,
the law of your Rights, is for real.

For any Judge, bureaucrat, lawyer or attorney to deny the validity of the Common Law he must deny
his own equity/admiralty/contract/chancery/civil law - the thing he holds most
sacred and from which he "earns" his bread.

Instead of Zoning...

From the preceding one can see the impossibility of placing equity based
zoning upon a society founded on the concepts of individual rights and private
property. If forced zoning is not a viable and legitimate course of action what
is?

You can do one of three things:

1) You can participate in using force and coercion against your neighbors
to comply with someone elses ever growing rule book. In which case they will
do the same to you.
2) You can positively induce your neighbors to comply
with what all of you consider proper.
3) Or you can do nothing and remain a
victim of either one of the above.

As has been pointed out elsewhere the difficulty in this issue is one of
fundamental philosophical thought and how we would all like to live our lives.
There is the first camp of believers that maintain it is necessary to force and
coerce others to do what a rule- book says is right and proper. They have the
crippled idea that men and women are not able to determine the best course for
their own lives and must be guided every step of the way so they do not hurt
themselves or their neighbors. This idea is usually coupled with the arrogant
stance of control, dictatorial posturing and greed which is answered through the
taking of the controlled persons property generally by subterfuge and fraud.

However, luckily for the rest of us, there is another group of people who
believe people are inherently stable, kind, generous, thinking and able to lead
their own lives without all the coercion, force or abuse.

The former create false scenarios that prey upon peoples fears thus
manipulating the fearful to do as they are being led to believe. This is a con
job. This is deception and fraud. This is misleading the victims for further
plundering of their rights, lives, freedoms and property at a later date. After
all (they connive) if you allow yourself to be deceived now you will allow
yourself to be taken again later. This is how thieves take your property by
getting you to fear more and more that not following them and their lies you
would be worse off than if you give these liars all they ask for now. This is
called appeasement of the enemy or in real terms - you buy back your own
protection from the thieves. It is thought that if we are nice and polite and
give up a little of our rights, lives, property to the thieves now they will
leave us alone. What really happens is they have now tasted blood (yours) and
will come back time after time again always taking bigger and bigger bites until
you have been drained of your very lifes blood.

The law of the land says there is only recourse if there has been damage. It
is not possible to have laws against things of the imagination like the fabled
"pig farmer" or the "big, bad out-of-town developer" moving in next door who is
really a figment of someones fear-filled mind. If such a person did move in next
door you would have a basis of a law suit at Law or in the Common Law Courts because you and
your property have been damaged. You would have "noticed him up" to the fact
that you would sue if damaged by his actions or negligence. This issue would be
heard and judged not by a Judge indoctrinated in and sworn to uphold equity law
but by 12 of your neighbors who know you and your property before it was
damaged. These Jurists are knowledgeable trustees of the Common Law. This Jury could not
force the pig farmer from raising all the pigs he wants on his own property but
they could force him to pay for the surrounding property he has damaged in his
negligent methods of pig production. Put through a couple of law suits like this
one and no pig farmers or developers would look twice at Cherry County because The People of
Cherry County bite hard.

Process these offensive people with zoning violations in an equity court and
theyd get a fine - maybe. Guess who gets to keep the fine or penalty money? Not
you, the damaged party, because equity zoning is primarily designed to increase
revenues and power for the county, its parasitic bureaucrats and hanger on
leeches - not you. You are regarded as a source of revenue - something to prey
upon - and nothing else.

You would, in a general sense, have almost zero recourse in equity court
because in equity court you have no recognized real property rights that could
have been damaged. Equity zoning, courts and bureaucracies are concerned with
the breaking of their rules, regulations, statutes and dictates.

You might be in a position to seek damages to your so-called Civil Rights.
These are nothing more than privileges granted to the population at large by the
bureaucracy. Privileges can be rescinded at a Judgess or bureaucrats whim but Common Law or
Constitutional Rights cannot be taken without real damages occurring. Which is
why the existing power structure hates the Common Law because it
puts an end to their lies, deceptions and theft of your property, your money,
your rights and your freedoms.

It is an oxymoron that if they were protecting you and your rights why is it
they are taking your rights to your own property to do it? Here, in effect, is
what is being said to you:

"We are going to implement zoning whether you like it or not and with our
usurped power you will stand aside as we take your property, your money, your
property rights, and your freedoms that you now use as you please and then, when
we get around to it, at our convenience and discretion, we will decide how we
will allow you to use any of what was once yours and how much we will charge you
for any privilege we might grant you."

Is this right, correct or proper? Is this the way you want your children to
live? Begging for their rights? Do you really think giving up your God- given
rights in exchange for bureaucrat granted privileges is a good idea?

Finding the Solution...

There are two ways to seek cooperative
effort with your neighbors: 1) by threats, duress and coercion (stick
method); 2) by positive motivation and inducements offered by rewards (carrot
method). We have seen the evilness of the first method which is used all over
America and the world. People hate being forced to do anything and are now
beginning to rebel against this mindless force. The second method has not been
tried in any governmental organization. However, if you but look, businesses all
over the world have been long recognizing this method as the far superior and
most easily worked and afforded. It goes something like this example:

If there are construction standards, for instance, that The People of this
county feel would benefit them The People can offer an inducement to themselves
to adopt these standards voluntarily. An example of this would be to offer a
reduction in taxes if these construction methods are used. The logic is that a
better wired house is less apt to catch fire and would require less fire
protection. A better built house suffers less damage by wind or rain. If the
reduction in taxes coincides with the cost of these standards people would be
moving heaven and earth to comply. No enforcement problem here is there? There
is no fear or force or threat or negative emotions raised. There are only
positive aspirations to make things better for ones self - which is the
community.

The most heard objection to positive motivational techniques is to the
effect that "we need all the government we can get and the government we now
have needs more of your money, your rights and your property" in order to better
do their job. Nothing could be further from the truth. It is an established fact
that not one person knows the real facts about their own government and its
finances. The above illusion is based on hearsay, indoctrination, regimentation
and fear which are all engendered by lack of knowledge as to the real facts.

You MUST Get
Knowledge...

So the other side of the positive motivational method is KNOWLEDGE. Each and
every person who professes to have rights, property and freedom must educate
themselves and see that their neighbors are likewise enlightened as to your
rights and the Law. It is well recognized that

if you do not know and protect your rights

you do not have any.

If your neighbor does not have any rights neither do you. It is through
knowledge such as is given here that you will become aware you are more than a
peon of the bureaucrats and their rule books and deserve better treatment,
respect and consideration.The People, in fact, are the principals of government.
The bureaucrats are only servants to The People. Agents can be fired by
principals. When the people lead the so-called leaders will follow - or get
voted out.

* You MUST Take an Interest...

Here are some reasonable and pointed questions The People of this or any
other county need to ask of your employees, the people you put in office to mind
your business for you:

1) How much money leaves this county in the form of gasoline taxes? Where
does it go? Does the same amount come back for your own county road
maintenance? If not why not?
2) Have you reviewed your elected employees to
see you are getting your moneys worth? If not why havent you?
3) Where is
all the property tax money going? If rural property is paying one dollar an
acre how much is that for your county and where does all this money go?
Why?
4) Who sets policy? According to whos wishes?
5) What is voted on?
What is not voted on and why?

All this tax money is really your money to be spent as you see fit - not the
way the bureaucrats want to spend it. When you see how much money is really
involved and where it goes and where it doesnt go you will be dumbfounded.

* You MUST Assume Responsibility...

Another thing you can do is to serve lawful notice on your neighbors (which
includes your government (elected) and its appointees (unelected)) that if they
pursue any enterprise that results in damages to your person, your property,
your rights or your freedoms you will take them to the nearest Common Law Court
to be judged by 12 of your neighbors (peers) for damage assessment. Zoning
violators are usually assessed "fines" which the government pockets even if you
were the one damaged - you, the victim, may get nothing.

These damage awards to you would far exceed any fines to your government.

When one handles their own Common Law suit not
only are the awards greater but they get to keep what is rightfully theirs
instead of buying expensive new cars, houses and fancy suits for "hired
attorneys".

* You MUST Demand Respect...

Whack a few trespassers with a few common law suits and the others will
become respectful and considerate of your rights and property very quickly.

* Establish a County Council...

All across America citizens are forming County Councils composed of five
elected persons and a secretary chosen by popular choice of the countys people.
The Councils function is to watch those in power to assure compliance with the
wishes of The People and also to:

1) Set salaries for all elected officials.
2) Fill vacancies of County
Commissioners.
3) Suspend public officials when required.
4) Review all
county offices.

Why doesnt Cherry County
have one?

* Establish a Common Law Court...

In equity Court you have only privileges granted by the government - the
rulers (as in King). Under Common Law you have fundamental Rights to property.
If there is no place to get Common Law justice
there are no Common Law rights being protected. Why doesnt Cherry County have one?

* Establish Common Law Study Groups...

You need more and better information concerning your rights. The schools are
forbidden from teaching it, the established legal system will fight it, the
libraries have been dumbed down and have not this knowledge. The only place you
can get educated is with home schooling and this is best done with others also
pursuing greater understandings and protections. Get together with your
neighbors on a weekly basis in small groups and study these matters until you
know who and what you are legally, socially, politically and what it means to be
a responsible human being as an integral part of your local, state and national
communities.

* Get a Land Patent on your Property...

There is a vast difference between classes of land ownership. Right now you
have a type of lease/rent/possession ownership. Unless you have a Land Patent
you do not have DOMINION ownership. The government has tried to reserve the
so-called rights of eminent domain which means you do not have dominion only
possession and pay a yearly rent in the form of land or property taxes. Think
this is a joke? Try not paying this rent (taxes) for three years and you will be
dispossessed of the right of use which right of use is then sold (how can
someone sell something that is not theirs?) to someone else for the delinquent
rent. If you owned it out right how could anyone take it from you especially the
government when they are specifically prohibited from depriving We The People of
our property? Learn the difference and then get it straightened out.

* Establish Private Covenant Agreements...

Many people across this great nation are realizing the shortcomings
associated with zoning and the subsequent government abuses that go along with
it. Instead they are grouping together and determining among themselves what
they want done with their neighborhoods and they are forming private contracts
or agreements binding themselves to mutually support each other and their
respective ideals or goals. These may be building restrictions, use restrictions
and any number of detailed items. These agreements are a form of contract,
willing entered into by all parties to the agreement. These are sometimes called
covenant agreements.

* Establish Common Law Trusts...

People are finding out that a Common Law Trust is better than corporations,
partnerships or even contracts for administering to certain situations. Some are
placing their properties into trusts to be taken care of by their trustees for
their benefit. The trustees behave and act in specific ways and for specific
purposes. Why not cancel the city and county corporate charters and place the
community properties into trusts to be administered for the benefit of The
People? This would at one stroke take government out of the equity and place
them into the Common Law where they belong - with the rest of us.

Everything you need to create your own Unincorporated Business
Organization. All forms supplied - just fill in the blanks. This onshore Common
Law Business Trust has successfully weathered two IRS
audits!!!

Click banner below.

Attorneys Oath... An attorney is an agent of the court and has sworn
an oath to represent 1) the Bar Association (a private organization) primarily;
2) the court; 3) the government and lastly 4) you, the paying client. If he
represents you primarily he will be dis-barred from his private club. Where does
this put him when he is elected to public office to represent you primarily?
What happens when an attorney swears to uphold equity law then takes an oath to
uphold and defend Constitutional Law
which is to say Common Law? (Corpus Jurus Secundum).

Common Law
Lawyers... An interesting thing is when a lawyer takes an interest in the Common Law which is to
say your Rights. He gets extremely busy with new business because he starts
winning all of his cases against purely equity practicing opponents. When the
real Law is being used properly the pseudo-color-of-law (equity) takes a hike.

Houston does not have zoning - There can be life without zoning. Houston,
Texas has no zoning and is three times larger than Omaha. This leading edge
business environment is prospering and progressing without all the false
predictions of doom and anarchy.

Are the Feds back at it and in back of it? Not succeeding as they had hoped
with the Scenic River fiasco -
the Feds are now apparently using your own zoning effort to sneak in the rest of
their hidden (occult) agenda. It turns out that actually it is the UNs
biodiversity program for depopulation of rural
America being implemented. The UN is a privately controlled (Rockefeller
et al) and managed organization. They are not what they proport to be.

Proposition 3 of the current zoning plan handed out on December 12th
contains the details for fencing your river and creek banks. Does this include
the Minnechaduza which would
eliminate any number of your neighbors homes?

You thought this threat to your life style was gone. You were even told this
zoning was to protect you from these illegal thefts of your property. You were
told by those promoting this zoning that it would protect you from this outrage.
But guess what? Now it appears it is they and their hired agents who are after
your property and your life style as a front for the bad guys. Constant
vigilance is the price of freedom.

Now do you see why you have to
get involved, get interested
and
get it straightened out?

Because unless you do it - no one else will.

References - More Reading Materials on Zoning & Property
(Rights)

In court? Need assistance? Jurisdictionary

Modernization of Zoning - A Means to Reform

http://www.cato.org/pubs/regulation/reg19n2f.html

Property and Freedom - a book review

http://www.cato.org/pubs/regulation/regv22n2/bookreviews.pdf

Property and Freedom, by Richard Pipes; Hardcover, 317pp., ISBN:
0375404988; Publisher: Knopf Alfred A; April 1999

Alliance for
America

Citizens for
Constitutional Property Rights

Defenders of
Property Rights

Environmental
Conservation Organization

Forest
Service Theft of Property

National Association of Reversionary Property Owners

Law
Research & Registry

Pennsylvania
Landowners Association

Property
Rights

Siskiyou
County Farm Bureau

Take Back
Arkansas

Learn
COMMON LAW
get the complete
HOME STUDY
COURSE on
COMMON and STATUTORY Law

Need more privacy in your business and assets?
Get the
do-it-yourself
Unincorporated
Business
Trust

Delta Spectrum Research

Pond Science Institute

921 Santa Fe Avenue

La Junta, Colorado 81050

FAX 719-383-2920

Toll Free for Ordering 866-604-3463

Contact by email